Public review signals
What reviewers are finding so far.
This page summarizes what people have reported while trying to break DBaD’s logic, trace model, validation assumptions, and governance boundaries.
These counts are descriptive only. They are not a score, not a system-health grade, and not a risk verdict.
- 5 reports
- No score
- No risk grade
Quick orientation
Start Here
Choose whether you want to inspect runtime proof, review current findings, or submit a new issue.
All counts on this page are descriptive only. They do not rank DBaD, grade its risk, or convert the review backlog into a score.
Reviewer Snapshot
These are the simplest public counts, kept separate from deeper runtime aggregates.
Total Reports
5
Most Common Issue Type
logic_gap
Most Common Severity
high
Runtime Trace Aggregates
These counts come from stored DBaD traces. They are structured aggregates only, not a score, inference, risk grade, or system-health claim.
Observed Outcomes So Far
unknown
Most common recorded outcome across 96 stored traces.
- unknown: 87
- upheld: 3
- reversed: 1
- escalated: 0
- incident: 5
- no_observed_issue: 0
Expectation vs Observed Outcome
- Expected outcome recorded: 9
- Matches: 4
- Mismatches: 3
- Pending observation: 2
Mismatch pairs:
no_observed_issue->incident: 2upheld->incident: 1
Outcome vs Blind Spots
- unknown: 87 traces, 3 with blind spots, 3 with open blind spots
- upheld: 3 traces, 1 with blind spots, 0 with open blind spots
- reversed: 1 trace, 0 with blind spots, 0 with open blind spots
- escalated: 0 traces, 0 with blind spots, 0 with open blind spots
- incident: 5 traces, 1 with blind spots, 1 with open blind spots
- no_observed_issue: 0 traces, 0 with blind spots, 0 with open blind spots
State-Transition Evidence Coverage
- Traces with supported transitions: 16
- Traces missing evidence on at least one supported transition: 12
- Traces with all supported transitions evidenced: 4
- Supported transitions total: 25
- Supported transitions with evidence: 9
- Supported transitions missing evidence: 16
Completeness Attestation Status
unknown
- unknown: 66
- declared_complete: 25
- partial: 4
- not_attested: 1
Common Issue Types
- documentation_confusion: 1
- false_confidence: 2
- logic_gap: 2
Severity Mix
- critical: 1
- high: 4
Most Reported Problems
- Late restoration can mask historical contamination during downstream trust inheritance (logic_gap · critical)
- Legacy ethics calculator lacks current DecencyMeter advisory boundary warnings (documentation_confusion · high)
- High DecencyMeter scores can be mistaken for DBaD governance approval without trace status (false_confidence · high)
Frequent Phrases
- trace: 20
- boundary: 18
- not: 18
- trust: 17
- decencymeter: 17
- score: 16
- dbad: 14
- state: 12
- only: 12
- node: 12
It shows recurring logic-review signals, not a full issue tracker or a claim that DBaD is complete.
The v2.2 runtime demo shows the current integrity stack reviewers can challenge.
v2.2 demo · DecencyMeter bridge · Scoring anomalies · Pressure tests · Try to break DBaD · Submit a logic-review finding · Peer review · Examples